Oct 27, 2015 - In this article, we will guide you through 7 easy steps for DSLR camera's autofocus calibration process using Live View mode on the example of.

Brian Davies wrote: Is FoCal the micro adjustment software of choice? I have the 5DSR and run Windows 10 64 bit. FoCal is the only one I've been able to find. Find it to be really good to give excellent insight into the lens, and saves a lot of 'trial and error'. One thing I would mention though; one of my lenses is advised at -8 on FoCal - when then adjusting manually, I found -7 to be more accurate. So - great for insight, great to get you in the ballpark, but I'd then check a stop either side manually as a sense check. IMO you don't need software.

Best process I have ever seen was developed by this dude at Fred Miranda. Fast and free. And furthermore it does not require firing the shutter even once. I use it now with every new lens I get. Takes maybe 2 minutes once you get the hang of it. DotTune: a free and fast method for fine-tuning the autofocus on your lenses: 'What makes it faster and more accurate is that it doesn't rely on actual phase-detect focusing to derive the AF tune value.

Because PDAF has shot-to-shot variability, all existing AF tune techniques require multiple images taken at each tune value to eliminate that variability from the equation. And it's the need for multiple shots that make those techniques more prone to AF tune measurement error.' Sage wrote: Does Fo Cal give repeatable results? For example, if you run the same lens through it twice, back-to-back will it give the same micro adjustment amount? If not, then how reliable can it really be. It is very accurate, consistent and repeatable. It surprised me.

The reason it does not work on full auto is because Canon stopped releasing the SDK. It did not work on my 5D3 either. It is no big deal. When requested you just have to enter a MFA value 4 times as it runs though it's process.

Right now it won't work at all for Canon and MAC Sierra. They are waiting for Canon to release the updated software libraries which was supposed to be in January. I just contacted them and they said within the next few weeks. I just entered my 5D3 values into my 5D4 and it is spot on. It only really needs it when I use the TC with my 100-400 II. A few things.

Lighting is important. You need a bright light on it but I think I read they made some improvements with that. You can use an incandescent light but I picked up a couple of daylight balanced studio bulbs. Can't use fluorescent because it flickers. I found no difference in the readings between the studio lights and incandescent but since I shoot in the daylight most of the time I just wanted to be sure.

Shaan caliche dil kya kare free mp3 download. There are instructions in the manual of what type of lights are OK. Also the type off ink used to print the target is important as well. No laser because it is too reflective.

Ink Jet is OK. All the local quick print places sue Laser so I bought the hard target. I still got the same results with my junky cheap ink jet as the hard target but I don't care. It will last a lifetime. I'm tuning $8,000 worth of precision equipment so that purchase was insignificant to me. Zee Char wrote: Sage wrote: Does Fo Cal give repeatable results?

Deadwood season 4. For example, if you run the same lens through it twice, back-to-back will it give the same micro adjustment amount? If not, then how reliable can it really be.

It is very accurate, consistent and repeatable. It surprised me. The reason it does not work on full auto is because Canon stopped releasing the SDK. It did not work on my 5D3 either. It is no big deal. When requested you just have to enter a MFA value 4 times as it runs though it's process. Right now it won't work at all for Canon and MAC Sierra.